Skip to main content

The Dangerous Job of Protest Reporting

Protests are among the most powerful ways that citizens express their discontent with those in power. It follows that stories and coverage of protests are an essential and powerful form of reporting that can help people understand the events on the ground where protests unfold. But reporting from protests is also one of the more hazardous places for a journalist to be. Throughout last summer, we saw attacks and arrests increase starkly against journalists doing the important work of covering protests on the ground. The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker reported a significant uptick in these incidents, and we even saw the dramatic scenarios play out on TV. 



CNN's Omar Jimenez was arrested on live television in Minneapolis last summer. This highly publicized event brought to the spotlight the real risks that protest reporters undertake when bringing these important stories.

This of course plays out internationally as well. Over the last two months, violent clashes between protestors and the military have played out in Myanmar, where the military overthrew the government in a coup. This dramatic event has of course demanded the attention of the region's reporters. Such a volatile situation, however, can be dangerous. 

Three weeks ago, AP reporter Thein Zaw was arrested while doing his job of covering the protests in Myanmar. He was finally released on Wednesday, but he says that many other journalists remain in a Myanmar prison and that he was worried every single day that he was detained. Thein Zaw is one of hundreds who are arrested for doing their jobs every year, and these incidents especially occur in the critical times of cultural and political upheaval. It is important to remember and appreciate the efforts by these reporters who bring such critical coverage. 


                                             Thein Zaw, AP Reporter




Comments

  1. Dawson McMonigleApril 25, 2021 at 4:53 PM

    Hey Adyson this is a really good post and topic! I think the concern and attention is warranted but I’m not sure the uptick by the freedom tracker is indicative of a true increase in wrongful arrests or detentions. There were many rioters and violent protesters that claimed to be journalists and in this there was a lot of confusion and in confusion comes mistakes more often than not. In many of these cases there are reporters repeatedly ignoring authorities which then prompted these arrests or detentions. Though reporting is important these people must respect the law and not add more confusion and dress to an already hectic event. I also do not think this is a reflection of our government or what we stand for as the cases in Myanmar are of their government. When wrongdoing occurs in the U.S. our system corrects the issue where Myanmar is and the arrests and imprisonment of their reporters is stemming directly from their government. So though I think we should always talk about this issue and ensure the integrity of reporting and transparency in the US I think we should recognize the freedom our press does have and how great it truly is despite recent events.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Madison CummingsApril 26, 2021 at 3:29 PM

    Last summer when I first saw Omar Jimenez get arrested on live TV while covering a protest, I was completely shocked. Not only was he being unproblematic and not provoking arrest, the U.S. Constitution protects the people's right to protest (if he wanted to.) Growing up I can remember hearing stories on the news about journalists in Iraq being kidnapped or killed. This threatening behavior towards journalists is not something you would expect from the United States.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biden's First Press Conference

After over two months of waiting, the media finally got its chance to have a formal press conference with President Biden. The lack of a press conference turned into a mini-scandal of sorts, especially on right wing media outlets, but also mainstream media as well. As a result, you might expect that the DC press corps would come armed with a wide range of questions that produce valuable, insightful answers from the new President about the many problems facing the country. But the press conference was a boring, barely newsworthy affair that's most reported on answer involved the horserace politics of an election four years away.  The new President simply was somehow not asked about the pandemic that has dominated the news cycle for the last year. Instead, the majority of the questions centered on the surge of people arriving at the border from Central America. Immigration and border stories are important, and the problem isn't that he should not have been asked about that. But s...
7 comments
Read more

Reporting on the Police

 Almost a year after George Floyd's death sparked worldwide protests, the man who kneeled on his neck was ultimately convicted of murder and is facing decades in prison. This traumatic cultural moment has raised an important question for young journalists - how do you report on police activity? The question has been raised in light of the initial press release from Minneapolis Police shortly after George Floyd's death. In a statement, the police said Floyd "appeared to be suffering medical distress" and was subsequently transported via ambulance to a hospital where he died "a short time later". At no point in the release was it made clear that Derek Chauvin had placed his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly 10 minutes while he gasped for air and told the officers that he could not breathe. This vague, misleading and wholly incorrect initial statement questions the whole premise of reporting solely on what police "said".  If not for the video, that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Washington Post's Costly Correction

 In January, the Washington Post dropped a bombshell story that former President Trump had urged an investigator to "find the fraud" in Georgia in an effort to alter his loss to President Biden in the state. They ran this juicy quote in their headline and stuck it in their lead, only to have to issue an embarrassingly long correction two months later that they had misquoted the former President in their story after an audio tape was released. There are a few points that need to be made in light of this correction. Immediately after it was ran, everybody jumped all over the Post, and they deserve criticism of course. However, before we get into the original mistake, it is important to remember that the criticism needs to be in fact of the original error, and not of the large correction itself. We should be glad that one of the nation's largest newspapers would correct a major aspect of a bombshell story in the first place. A much worse alternative would be if our mainstrea...
Post a Comment
Read more