Skip to main content

Reporting on the Police

 Almost a year after George Floyd's death sparked worldwide protests, the man who kneeled on his neck was ultimately convicted of murder and is facing decades in prison. This traumatic cultural moment has raised an important question for young journalists - how do you report on police activity?

The question has been raised in light of the initial press release from Minneapolis Police shortly after George Floyd's death. In a statement, the police said Floyd "appeared to be suffering medical distress" and was subsequently transported via ambulance to a hospital where he died "a short time later". At no point in the release was it made clear that Derek Chauvin had placed his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly 10 minutes while he gasped for air and told the officers that he could not breathe. This vague, misleading and wholly incorrect initial statement questions the whole premise of reporting solely on what police "said". 



If not for the video, that release may have been the final word on George Floyd. But of course, a bystanders video did show the actual events of that day, and a year later Chauvin was convicted of murder. Going forward, it is important for journalists to remember that police officers presenting the "official narrative" should never be the standalone source for a story, especially if the story involves potential police misconduct. 

An example where this is not done very well is this New York Times story about the police killing of Andrew Brown Jr. Here, the official narrative is heavily relied upon for the majority of the story, and it appears as though the Times did not make an effort to get any bystander accounts. 

Andrew Brown Jr. Shooting: Sheriff’s Deputy Kills Black Man in North Carolina - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

But based on this ABC News story, it appears there were indeed eyewitness accounts to dive into as they are cited in this story.

Bodycam video of Andrew Brown shooting will be redacted before shown to family (msn.com)

The nation's leading paper should take the lessons of George Floyd more seriously and improve its police reporting to reflect that the "official" narrative is only one particular narrative that may not be the truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fox News' Fauci Problem

Fascinating research has emerged that has hinted that widespread misinformation about the coronavirus, especially from conservative leaning outlets, led to a weakened response to the pandemic and potentially more spread than would have occurred without. Since the start of the pandemic, Fox News has certainly had much to say in that regard. Whether it was downplaying the pandemic's severity, opposing mask usage and social distancing protocols, or generally advising that Americans need not worry about COVID-19, the studies that will emerge on the effects of these messages will certainly be interesting. Special attention should be paid to the channel's coverage of Anthony Fauci. Ever since Fauci emerged as a sometimes oppositional voice to that of former President Donald Trump's, he became the target of ferocious conservative criticism. Even today, long after Fauci has been a visible enemy to Donald Trump, Fox News runs negative stories about him regularly.  A quick search of ...

How The Local News Decline Left Everyone Blindsided by Trump (Twice)

 Since 2004, more than 2000 local newspapers have gone out of business. Readership of local papers has plummeted by millions. More than 2000 counties do not have even have a daily paper in circulation . This problem is well documented, but Americans and the media class are still trying to grapple with the powerful loss of local community journalism that we have seen in this century. As the business model has waffled and the papers shut down, Americans have increasingly had to rely upon national publications for their news, or their own curated newsfeeds with content from hundreds of sources that may not adhere to journalistic principles. As a result, everyone has become more disconnected. Americans on either side of important issues no longer understand each other. They see each other as the characterizations that are often presented on cable news, and not as the real people in their communities that may have a nuanced opinion about one of the many defining, complex issues of life ...