Skip to main content

How The Local News Decline Left Everyone Blindsided by Trump (Twice)

 Since 2004, more than 2000 local newspapers have gone out of business. Readership of local papers has plummeted by millions. More than 2000 counties do not have even have a daily paper in circulation. This problem is well documented, but Americans and the media class are still trying to grapple with the powerful loss of local community journalism that we have seen in this century. As the business model has waffled and the papers shut down, Americans have increasingly had to rely upon national publications for their news, or their own curated newsfeeds with content from hundreds of sources that may not adhere to journalistic principles. As a result, everyone has become more disconnected.


Americans on either side of important issues no longer understand each other. They see each other as the characterizations that are often presented on cable news, and not as the real people in their communities that may have a nuanced opinion about one of the many defining, complex issues of life today. Often it is the case the there is not just two sides on these complex issues, but the tribal fighting of in Washington and the media's obsessive compulsion to cover it and all the political minutia that comes with it makes these issues seem black-and-white. More often, there is not even coverage of the issues themselves, only the politics of who is winning. This presentation divides us, and for many, turns us away from traditional news sources. But when we turn away from shared sources of news, we lose our sense of the country's temperature. In 2016, practically nobody saw Trump's win coming. Even ardent Trump supporters, and perhaps Trump himself, were caught pleasantly surprised. National media were among the most off guard, and that was clearly evident on election night itself. This was a group of "elite" reporters that were so out of touch with local communities that they had no idea what was coming, especially so in the deciding states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.


Despite the wall-to-wall coverage and the media marvel that was Donald Trumps often vile 2016 campaign, media elites completely missed that he stood an actual chance at winning. You might think, that four years later, there would be an effort to correct the course. But this did not happen. Local news remains on its deathbed, and the national media has hardly learned anything. They assumed that after four years characterized by chaos, Americans would send Trump home in one the most decisive losses ever delivered. And while yes, Trump lost the popular vote by a clear margin, he came within under 100,000 votes of winning the three swing states that he won in 2016 that would have made him a two term president. For as decisive as it may seem, it was rather close in other ways. And, through it all, Americans continue to lose connections with each other. Facebook newsfeeds are full of lies and division, but many millions of people rely on it exclusively. Our shared public square is toxic and devoid of critical discussion. We continue to drift apart. It may be too late to simply restore local papers and hope we can heal. Millions have developed new news habits that will be hard to break, given the satisfaction they deliver by convincing its digesters of their moral superiority. A helpful start would be a national media that makes an effort to really understand the America it serves, but I suspect that in the years of President Biden, they will wholly forget Trump happened, and brush off his rise as an anomaly of sorts. Should another Trump come about, the media will likely miss it once more. 








Comments

  1. Your point that many supporters of President Trump and even the President himself was surprised at his own win stood out to me. In my own blog, I go over this as well. Check me out: thefinalcheck.blogspot.com. The election was a turning point for distrust in the media, since the mainstream media was caught so nakedly off guard. I agree that the mainstream media is too quick to write off the last presidency as an anomaly. The media was essential in Trump's rise, because he used it so well. Like no other politician before, he captivated the media and was never burned by his own controversy to the people who mattered: his supporters.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reply #9: 03-21-2021: “How The Local News Decline Left Everyone Blindsided by Trump (Twice)”
    I certainly agree with your take that the media’s out of touch elitism left them utterly perplexed as to how a figure like Trump could win the presidency. You also hit the nail on the head pointing out that, while Trump lost this recent election, he was extremely close to winning. Let us not forget, Donald Trump now maintains the position of having the second most votes for president cast for him in American history. Furthermore, it is becoming apparent that the media seems to think that Trump’s supporters, his new populist coalition of traditional conservatives and working-class Americans, are just going to disperse into the ether. This is a huge mistake. It is much more likely that, provided a new populist Republican rises to prominence in the next few years, this coalition will return with a vengeance. One idea I would also posit is that the media actually desire Trump, or a Trump like figure in American politics. Trump was great for the most important thing the media needs: ratings, and the media needs a new Trump to generate controversy and attack in order to maintain the high they have been on for the last 4 years.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biden's First Press Conference

After over two months of waiting, the media finally got its chance to have a formal press conference with President Biden. The lack of a press conference turned into a mini-scandal of sorts, especially on right wing media outlets, but also mainstream media as well. As a result, you might expect that the DC press corps would come armed with a wide range of questions that produce valuable, insightful answers from the new President about the many problems facing the country. But the press conference was a boring, barely newsworthy affair that's most reported on answer involved the horserace politics of an election four years away.  The new President simply was somehow not asked about the pandemic that has dominated the news cycle for the last year. Instead, the majority of the questions centered on the surge of people arriving at the border from Central America. Immigration and border stories are important, and the problem isn't that he should not have been asked about that. But s...

The Dangerous Job of Protest Reporting

Protests are among the most powerful ways that citizens express their discontent with those in power. It follows that stories and coverage of protests are an essential and powerful form of reporting that can help people understand the events on the ground where protests unfold. But reporting from protests is also one of the more hazardous places for a journalist to be. Throughout last summer, we saw attacks and arrests increase starkly against journalists doing the important work of covering protests on the ground. The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker reported a significant uptick in these incidents, and we even saw the dramatic scenarios play out on TV.  CNN's Omar Jimenez was arrested on live television in Minneapolis last summer. This highly publicized event brought to the spotlight the real risks that protest reporters undertake when bringing these important stories. This of course plays out internationally as well. Over the last two months, violent clashes between protestors and the...